Tribal Public Health Improvement and Training

Oregon Public Health Modernization Program

Program Manager: Barbara Gladue, Little Shell and Turtle Mountain Bands of Chippewa Indians

Program Analyst: Melino Gianotti

The Northwest Tribal Epidemiology Center (NWTEC), at the Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board (NPAIHB), will work in partnership with the Tribal Foundation Public Health Services (TFPHS) technical workgroup to address unmet foundational public health services for the 29 federally-recognized tribes in Washington. The goal of the work will be to improve the quality of life for American Indian/Alaska Native people served by tribal clinics in Washington with a focus on communicable disease.

Program Manager: Nancy Bennett, MBA

Program Communicable Disease Epidemiologist: Ashley Hoover, MPH

Communicable Disease Data Briefs: 

Tuberculosis   HIV    Sexually Transmitted Infections    Hepatitis B & C        

Data Partners Meeting 2/3/21 

Meeting Notes     Agenda

Presentations:

Epicenter WTPHI overview – Victoria Warren Mears & Nancy Bennett, NPAIHB

Data Linkage – Sujata Joshi, NPAIHB

Data Briefs – Ashley Hoover, NPAIHB

ECHO – Megan Woodbury, NPAIHB

AIHC – Lou Schmitz, AIHC

Next Steps – Wrap up – Nancy Bennett & Ashley Hoover, NPAIHB

National Indian Health Board (NIHB):

• Accreditation is a process that will improve and protect the health of tribes by advancing the quality of public health services with improved coordination and potential for increased resources.
• Benefits to tribal members may include a positive impact to current and future health, longer life expectancy, cultural preservation, and improved quality of life.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC):

• Public Health system, policy, performance management, and workforce development and/or redevelopment.
• Efficient and effective use of time and resources across and within key areas via standardization, improved networking, best practice implementation, and cross-jurisdictional coordination and cooperation.
• Sustainable QI via accreditation.
• Creation of a national network; improved staff and resource distribution.
• Greater accountability and enhanced credibility to stakeholders, partners, and communities.

Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB):

• Improve and protect the health of tribes by advancing quality of Public Health services.
• Performance Management and QI; valuable, measurable feedback on strengths and areas of improvement.
• Encourage partnerships between Public Health practitioners, stakeholders and community members.
• Reduce health disparities; same level of Public Health services available to all.
• Recognition of excellence, clarification of expectations, and increased visibility and responsibility.

There are 3 prerequisites that need to be completed before applying for Public Health Accreditation: Community Health Assessment (CHA), Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP), and the Strategic Plan.  All of these are dependent upon the collection and analysis of health status data.  It is also important to perform a self-assessment to determine at what level the tribal health department is providing the 10 Essential Public Health Services, as well as readiness for accreditation.

Prerequisites Defined:

• Community Health Assessment (CHA): A community health assessment, in which a Health Department assesses the health needs in the community, the health status of the community and plans its services through the second document.
• Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP): A community health improvement plan, which maps out exactly what a Health Department is going to do as it works with partners to improve the health status of its jurisdiction.
• Strategic Plan: A strategic plan for the health department, which indicates a Health Department’s service priorities and how it plans to accomplish its strategic goals.

Benefits of CHAs & CHIPs:

• Increases visibility of public health services.
• Creates advocates for public health services.
• Creates a healthy community and better quality of life.
• Anticipates and manages change more effectively.
• Creates a stronger public health infrastructure.
• Builds stronger partnerships within the community.
• Builds public health leadership within the community.

MAPP tool: Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships (MAPP) is a community-driven, strategic planning process for improving community health.  It is facilitated by public health leaders.  This framework helps communities to apply strategic thinking to prioritize public health issues and identify resources to address them.  MAPP is not an agency-focused assessment process; rather, it is an interactive process that can improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and ultimately the performance of local public health systems.  Completing the MAPP process will give you the Community Health Assessment and Community Health Improvement Plan, and also help inform your Strategic Plan.

NPHPSP tool: The National Public Health Performance Standards Program is a National Partnership initiative that has developed National Public Health Performance Standards for state and local public health systems, and also for public health governing bodies.

• Provides performance standards for public health systems and encourages their widespread use.
• Encourages and leverages national, state, and local partnerships to build a stronger foundation for public health preparedness.
• Promotes continuous quality improvement of public health systems.
• Strengthens the science-base for public health practice improvement.
• NPHPSP will give you capacity or assessment of the system, help inform the Community Health Assessment, Community Health Improvement Plan and Strategic Plan, and is one of the 4 MAPP assessments.
• Assesses readiness: purpose and benefits, resources, strategic fit, leadership.

MAPP Publications
Integrating MAPP, NPHPSP and Accreditation

How does PHAB differ from JCAHO and AAAHC accreditation?

All three types of accreditation aim to promote quality of services and performance, based on a national set of standards; where they differ are the types of entities that are eligible to apply for accreditation and the types of services that the standards are designed to improve. Each accrediting body is a unique entity that has different policies, procedures, standards, methodology for revising its standards, length of awarding accreditation, etc.  A little about the three organizations is listed below for a quick comparison.

• Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO): an independent, not-for-profit organization that accredits health care organizations and programs in the United States. JCAHO currently accredits over 19,000 health care organizations.  Over the years, the Joint Commission transitioned from accrediting hospitals only to an organization that accredits a variety of healthcare organizations, including ambulatory care, home care, hospice care, and laboratories in hospitals.  Learn more about JCAHO at their website.
• The Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC): a private, non-profit organization that accredits organizations that promotes patient safety and quality, and value for ambulatory health care.  AAAHC currently accredits almost 5,000 organizations that provide services in the ambulatory health care setting.  The types of organizations that become accredited include ambulatory and surgery centers, community health centers, medical and dental group practices, medical homes, and managed care organizations, as well as tribal and student health centers.  They are also the official accrediting organization for the US Air Force and the US Coast Guard. Learn more about AAAHC at their website.
• The Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB): a national non-profit organization that awards accreditation to tribal, state, local, and territorial health departments. Currently, there are no nationally accredited governmental public health departments because PHAB’s accreditation program will launch in fall 2011. The goal of national public health accreditation is to improve and protect the public’s health by advancing the quality and performance of public health departments. Learn more about PHAB at their website.

My health department wants to apply for accreditation, what are the next steps?

1. Appoint an Accreditation Coordinator and department-wide team for review of the process, standards, measures, and documentation guidance, as well as the identification of documents.
2. Review PHAB’s Online Orientation to Public Health Department Accreditation. While this review is required for the Accreditation Coordinator and the health department director, it contains great information that health departments can share with their staff, boards of health, elected officials, and community partners as they prepare for accreditation.
3. Review the documentation requirements for the measures and note the areas where the health department needs to be sure that documentation potentially used in accreditation is “up to speed”. That means dating agendas, communications, and policies as they are developed; signing and dating contracts; keeping sign-in sheets for various trainings; and creating an electronic filing system to store information so that it can be easily found for future reference.
4. Begin/refine work on the prerequisites. Completing these prerequisites lays wonderful groundwork for identifying the documentation for meeting the rest of the measures. So, getting these done properly will get a health department off to a good start. Remember to contact Rachel Ford at rford@npaihb.org for technical assistance.
5. Prepare documentation according to the guidance contained in the PHAB Standards and Measures Version 1.0.

I understand that the IRS will require hospitals to develop a Community Health Assessment. Should my health department seek to collaborate with the local hospital to develop one assessment that addresses both the health department’s and the hospital’s Community Health Assessment needs?

PHAB strongly encourages health departments to develop partnerships with hospitals and other community members in order to collaborate on a variety of efforts, as indicated throughout the PHAB standards and measures.  Hospitals are critical partners and can contribute primary and secondary data, planning expertise, community meeting facilities, as well as community health education and health promotion programs and services.
The IRS requirement that non-profit hospitals report on the development of a Community Health Assessment provides a perfect opportunity for your health department to initiate or further develop your partnership with local non-profit hospitals.  Collaboration on the development of a Community Health Assessment that addresses both of your information needs can be one element of your partnership.  PHAB encourages you to review the IRS reporting form for hospitals (Schedule H, Form 990, OMB No. 1545-0047).  Part V, Section B, sets forth the details that are to be reported including the hospital’s process for consultation with others who represent the community’s interest, the process for identifying and prioritizing health needs, and how the hospital addressed those identified health needs.  In addition to the Community Health Assessment, non-profit hospitals are required to report their “community benefit” and “community building” activities, including coalition building and community health improvement advocacy.  All of these IRS requirements provide an excellent opportunity and incentive for health departments and non-profit hospitals to work together to improve health of the population for the benefit of the community.  For more information, please visit this IRS website.